Longitudinal Implementation Strategy Tracking System (LISTS)
Qualitative/Quantitative:
The assessment instrument uses quantitative and/or qualitative data
QuantitativeType of Instrument:
The type of the assessment instrument
SurveyNumber of Items:
Number of items in the assessment instrument
Not FoundSubscale Information:
Names of each of the subscales and the number of items for each of the subscales
No SubscalesLanguage Availability:
Language(s) in which the assessment instrument is available
EnglishBrief Description:
Brief summary description of assessment instrument
Longitudinal Implementation Strategy Tracking System (LISTS) is a methodology to document and characterize implementation strategies use over time.Citing Literature - Development/Original:
Reference for publication describing the development of the assessment instrument
Smith JD, Norton WE, Mitchell SA, Cronin C, Hassett MJ, Ridgeway JL, Garcia SF, Osarogiagbon RU, Dizon DS, Austin JD, Battestilli W, Richardson JE, Tesch NK, Cella D, Cheville AL, DiMartino LD; IMPACT Consortium. The Longitudinal Implementation Strategy Tracking System (LISTS): feasibility, usability, and pilot testing of a novel method. Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Nov 28;4(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00529-w. PMID: 38017582; PMCID: PMC10683230.Citing Literature - Empirical Use/Application:
Reference for publications on the application of the assessment instrument
Smith JD, Merle J, Webster KA, Cahue S, Penedo FJ, Garcia SF. Tracking dynamic changes in implementation strategies over time within a hybrid type 2 trial of an electronic patient-reported oncology symptom and needs monitoring program. Front Health Serv. 2022;2:983217. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.983217. Website:
Website providing access to and/or describing the assessment instrument
Not FoundAttachments:
Related files uploaded (instrument if directly available) including descriptions for each
Not FoundVersion:
Number/name of the most recent version of the assessment instrument
Not FoundRelated Instrument:
Indicate if assessment instrument is related to another instrument in the repository.
Not FoundImplementation Science Considerations
- Adaptation in dissemination and implementation science
- Adherence Optimization Framework
- CDC DHAP's Research-to-Practice Framework
- Choosing Wisely Deimplementation Framework
- Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR)
- Conceptual Framework for Research Knowledge Transfer and Utilization
- Conceptual Model of Implementation Research
- Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
- Dissemination and Implementation Framework for an Early Childhood Obesity Prevention Program
- Dynamic Sustainability Framework
- EQ-DI Framework
- Facilitating Adoption of Best Practices (FAB) Model
- Framework for Enhancing the Value of Research for Dissemination and Implementation
- General theory of implementation
- Health Equity Implementation Framework
- Health Promotion Technology Transfer Process
- Implementation Effectiveness Model
- Interacting Elements of Integrating Science, Policy, and Practice
- Intervention Mapping
- Knowledge Exchange Framework
- Marketing and Distribution System for Public Heatlh
- Model for Predictors of Adoption
- Organizational Theory of Innovation Implementation
- Pathways to Evidence Informed Policy
- Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM)
- RE-AIM 2.0/Contextually Expanded RE-AIM
- Replicating Effective Programs Framework
- Stetler Model of Research Utilization
- Stirman framework and coding system for modifications and adaptations of evidence-based interventions
- Technology Transfer Model
- Transcreation Framework for Community-engaged Behavioral Interventions to Reduce Health Disparities
- Utilization-Focused Surveillance Framework
Constructs Assessed:
Constructs assessed by the assessment instrument (linked to constructs included in the D&I models webtool)
Theories, Models, Frameworks Assessed:
Not FoundThe D&I TMFs relevant for the assesment instrument based on constructs assessed
Implementation Outcomes:
AdaptationThe relevance of the assessment instrument to various implementation outcomes
ImplementationImplementation Strategies:
Use of evaluative and iterative strategiesThe implementation strategy/ies evaluated by the assessment instrument
Adapt and tailor to contextPhase of Implementation Process:
ImplementationPhase of implementation process when the assessment instrument can be used
Models Assessed:
Intended Focus
Levels of Data Collection:
OrganizationalThe level(s) from which the assessment instrument collects data
SystemIntended Priority Population:
Researcher/EvaluatorIntended priority population from whom data are collected using the assessment instrument
Intended Priority Setting:
Clinical OutpatientIntended priority setting in which the assessment instrument is used
Clinical InpatientPolicy:
Not FoundAssessment instrument is relevant to policy
Equity Focus:
Not FoundAssessment instrument includes at least one equity-focused component
Psychometric Properties
Scoring:
Not FoundThe assessment instrument produces a composite score
Norms:
Not FoundMeasures of central tendency and distribution for the total score are based on small, medium, large sample size
Responsiveness:
Not FoundThe ability of the assessment instrument to detect change over time (i.e., sensitivity to change or intervention effects).
Validity:
Not FoundReliability:
Not FoundFactor Analysis:
Not Found
Pragmatic Properties
Time to Administer:
Not FoundThe amount of time required to complete the assessment instrument
Secondary Data:
Not FoundCost:
Not FoundCost associated with access to assessment instrument (Some insturments might require login.)
Literacy:
Not FoundReadability of the items reported on.
Interpretation:
Not FoundExpertise needed for interpretation of data is reported.
Training:
Not FoundExpertise needed to use the assessment instrument is reported
Resources Required to Administer:
None/LowResources needed to administer the assessment instrument (FTE for data collector, equipment, etc.)
User Guidance:
Not FoundGuides are provided to support administration of assessment instrument/data collection, and/or analysis of data from the assessment instrument, and/or interpretation of data, and/or action/decision on how to use data
Obtrusiveness:
Low: Automated collection of data or secondary dataDegree of intrusion the participants will experience because of the data collection when using the assessment instrument (e.g., assessment instruments that rely on use of secondary data or automated data will be less obtrusive)
Medium: Asyncronous collection of dataInteractivity:
Not FoundData collection and/or result generation involves interactive components.
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one.