« Back to Assessment Instruments

PRISM Interview Guide

Qualitative/Quantitative:
information tooltip image The assessment instrument uses quantitative and/or qualitative data

  • Qualitative

Type of Instrument:
information tooltip image The type of the assessment instrument

  • Individual Interview

Number of Items:
information tooltip image Number of items in the assessment instrument

15

Subscale Information:
information tooltip image Names of each of the subscales and the number of items for each of the subscales

Community Hospital Transition Program: Pre-Implementation (8)
Multi-modal Pain Management: Pre-implementation (15)
Patient Reported Health Status: Dissemination (6)

Language Availability:
information tooltip image Language(s) in which the assessment instrument is available

  • English

Brief Description:
information tooltip image Brief summary description of assessment instrument

The PRISM (Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model) is a framework used to guide and evaluate the implementation and sustainability of healthcare programs. Each set of interview questions aligns with PRISM categories but can be adjusted to fit the specific context and objectives of the project. This allows for a thorough assessment of how different factors impact the success of each project, ultimately aiming to improve healthcare outcomes, enhance patient and provider experiences, and reduce costs.

Citing Literature - Development/Original:
information tooltip image Reference for publication describing the development of the assessment instrument

Ayele, R. A., Lawrence, E., McCreight, M., Fehling, K., Peterson, J., Glasgow, R. E., Rabin, B. A., Burke, R., & Battaglia, C. (2017). Study protocol: improving the transition of care from a non-network hospital back to the patient's medical home. BMC health services research, 17(1), 123. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2048-z. PMID: 28183346 PMCID: PMC5301366.

Citing Literature - Empirical Use/Application:
information tooltip image Reference for publications on the application of the assessment instrument

McCreight, M. S., Rabin, B. A., Glasgow, R. E., Ayele, R. A., Leonard, C. A., Gilmartin, H. M., Frank, J. W., Hess, P. L., Burke, R. E., & Battaglia, C. T. (2019). Using the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) to qualitatively assess multilevel contextual factors to help plan, implement, evaluate, and disseminate health services programs. Translational behavioral medicine, 9(6), 1002–1011. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibz085. PMID: 31170296.

Knudsen, H. K., Drainoni, M. L., Gilbert, L., Huerta, T. R., Oser, C. B., Aldrich, A. M., Campbell, A. N. C., Crable, E. L., Garner, B. R., Glasgow, L. M., Goddard-Eckrich, D., Marks, K. R., McAlearney, A. S., Oga, E. A., Scalise, A. L., & Walker, D. M. (2020). Model and approach for assessing implementation context and fidelity in the HEALing Communities Study. Drug and alcohol dependence, 217, 108330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108330. PMID: 33086156 PMCID: PMC7531282.

Website:
information tooltip image Website providing access to and/or describing the assessment instrument

Attachments:
information tooltip image Related files uploaded (instrument if directly available) including descriptions for each

Version:
information tooltip image Number/name of the most recent version of the assessment instrument

Not Found

Related Instrument:
information tooltip image Indicate if assessment instrument is related to another instrument in the repository.

  • PRISM
  • PRISM survey eScreening
  • Intended Focus

      Levels of Data Collection:
      information tooltip image The level(s) from which the assessment instrument collects data

      • Individual (Patient, Community Member)
      • Implementer
      • Organizational

      Intended Priority Population:
      information tooltip image Intended priority population from whom data are collected using the assessment instrument

      • Community Members/Patients
      • Clinician
      • Administrator
      • Other Staff

      Intended Priority Setting:
      information tooltip image Intended priority setting in which the assessment instrument is used

      • Clinical Outpatient
      • Clinical Inpatient
      • Residential Care
      • Community Organization

      Policy:
      information tooltip image Assessment instrument is relevant to policy

      • Healthcare Financing/Reimbursement
      • Clinical Practice

      Equity Focus:

      Not Found
  • Psychometric Properties

      Scoring:
      information tooltip image The assessment instrument produces a composite score

      No

      Norms:
      information tooltip image Measures of central tendency and distribution for the total score are based on small, medium, large sample size

      Not Found

      Responsiveness:
      information tooltip image The ability of the assessment instrument to detect change over time (i.e., sensitivity to change or intervention effects).

      Not Found

      Validity:
      information tooltip image The extent to which an instrument measures what it is intended to measure accurately.

      Not Found

      Reliability:
      information tooltip image The extent to which results are consistent results over time, across raters, across settings, or across items intended to measure the same thing.

      Not Found

      Factor Analysis:
      information tooltip image A statistical method that uses the correlation between observed variables to identify common factors.

      Not Found
  • Pragmatic Properties

      Time to Administer:
      information tooltip image The amount of time required to complete the assessment instrument

      Not Found

      Secondary Data:

      Not Found

      Cost:
      information tooltip image Cost associated with access to assessment instrument (Some insturments might require login.)

      Free

      Literacy:
      information tooltip image Readability of the items reported on.

      Yes

      Interpretation:
      information tooltip image Expertise needed for interpretation of data is reported.

      No

      Training:
      information tooltip image Expertise needed to use the assessment instrument is reported

      No

      Resources Required to Administer:
      information tooltip image Resources needed to administer the assessment instrument (FTE for data collector, equipment, etc.)

      None/Low

      User Guidance:
      information tooltip image Guides are provided to support administration of assessment instrument/data collection, and/or analysis of data from the assessment instrument, and/or interpretation of data, and/or action/decision on how to use data

      Not Found

      Obtrusiveness:
      information tooltip image Degree of intrusion the participants will experience because of the data collection when using the assessment instrument (e.g., assessment instruments that rely on use of secondary data or automated data will be less obtrusive)

      • Medium: Asyncronous collection of data

      Interactivity:
      information tooltip image Data collection and/or result generation involves interactive components.

      • Adaptive Instrument