Iterative, Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (iPRISM) webtool
Qualitative/Quantitative:
The assessment instrument uses quantitative and/or qualitative data
QualitativeQuantitative
Type of Instrument:
The type of the assessment instrument
Periodic ReflectionNumber of Items:
Number of items in the assessment instrument
22Subscale Information:
Names of each of the subscales and the number of items for each of the subscales
PRISM Context Assessment: 6
RE-AIM Program Outcome Assessment: 16Language Availability:
Language(s) in which the assessment instrument is available
EnglishSpanish
Brief Description:
Brief summary description of assessment instrument
The iPRISM webtool was designed to assess and guide a program’s (a) alignment with context, (b) progress on pragmatic outcomes, (c) potential adaptations, and (d) future sustainability across the stages of the implementation lifecycle.Citing Literature - Development/Original:
Reference for publication describing the development of the assessment instrument
Trinkley, K.E., Glasgow, R.E., D’Mello, S. et al. The iPRISM webtool: an interactive tool to pragmatically guide the iterative use of the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model in public health and clinical settings. Implement Sci Commun 4, 116 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-023-00494-4Citing Literature - Empirical Use/Application:
Reference for publications on the application of the assessment instrument
Johnson et. al. (2024) Use of the iPRISM webtool in a learning community to assess implementation context and fit of a novel clinical decision support tool for physical therapy triage in acute care hospitals. PM&R: The journal of injury, function and rehabilitation. In press.Website:
Website providing access to and/or describing the assessment instrument
Attachments:
Related files uploaded (instrument if directly available) including descriptions for each
Version:
Number/name of the most recent version of the assessment instrument
Not FoundRelated Instrument:
Indicate if assessment instrument is related to another instrument in the repository.
Iterative RE-AIMImplementation Science Considerations
Constructs Assessed:
Not FoundConstructs assessed by the assessment instrument (linked to constructs included in the D&I models webtool)
Theories, Models, Frameworks Assessed:
Not FoundThe D&I TMFs relevant for the assesment instrument based on constructs assessed
Implementation Outcomes:
AdoptionThe relevance of the assessment instrument to various implementation outcomes
Effectiveness
Implementation
Reach
SustainmentImplementation Strategies:
Not FoundThe implementation strategy/ies evaluated by the assessment instrument
Phase of Implementation Process:
Pre-ImplementationPhase of implementation process when the assessment instrument can be used
Implementation
SustainmentModels Assessed:
Intended Focus
Levels of Data Collection:
Individual (Patient, Community Member)The level(s) from which the assessment instrument collects data
Implementer
Organizational
Community
System
PolicyIntended Priority Population:
Community Members/PatientsIntended priority population from whom data are collected using the assessment instrument
Researcher/Evaluator
Clinician
Administrator
Public Health Practitioner
Teacher/Trainer
EmployerIntended Priority Setting:
Clinical OutpatientIntended priority setting in which the assessment instrument is used
Clinical Inpatient
Residential Care
Community Organization
Public Health Agency
School
WorkplacePolicy:
Not FoundAssessment instrument is relevant to policy
Equity Focus:
YesAssessment instrument includes at least one equity-focused component
Psychometric Properties
Scoring:
YesThe assessment instrument produces a composite score
Norms:
YesMeasures of central tendency and distribution for the total score are based on small, medium, large sample size
Responsiveness:
YesThe ability of the assessment instrument to detect change over time (i.e., sensitivity to change or intervention effects).
Validity:
Not FoundReliability:
Not FoundFactor Analysis:
Not Found
Pragmatic Properties
Time to Administer:
<30The amount of time required to complete the assessment instrument
Secondary Data:
Not FoundCost:
FreeCost associated with access to assessment instrument (Some insturments might require login.)
Literacy:
Not FoundReadability of the items reported on.
Interpretation:
Not FoundExpertise needed for interpretation of data is reported.
Training:
Not FoundExpertise needed to use the assessment instrument is reported
Resources Required to Administer:
None/LowResources needed to administer the assessment instrument (FTE for data collector, equipment, etc.)
User Guidance:
Guidance to AdministerGuides are provided to support administration of assessment instrument/data collection, and/or analysis of data from the assessment instrument, and/or interpretation of data, and/or action/decision on how to use data
Guidance to Analyze
Guidance to Interpret
Guidance for Action/DecisionObtrusiveness:
Medium: Asyncronous collection of dataDegree of intrusion the participants will experience because of the data collection when using the assessment instrument (e.g., assessment instruments that rely on use of secondary data or automated data will be less obtrusive)
High: Observation and syncronous collection of dataInteractivity:
Generative OutcomeData collection and/or result generation involves interactive components.
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one.