Local Wellness Policy Survey

Constructs Assessed:

Constructs assessed by the assessment instrument (linked to constructs included in the D&I models webtool)

• Process
• Pre-implementation
• Development of an Intervention

Theories, Models, Frameworks Relevant:

• Active Implementation Framework
• CDC DHAP's Research-to-Practice Framework
• Choosing Wisely Deimplementation Framework
• Conceptual Framework for Research Knowledge Transfer and Utilization
• Conceptualizing Dissemination Research and Activity: Canadian Heart Health Initiative
• Conduct and Utilization of Research in Nursing (CURN)
• Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
• Davis' Pathman-PRECEED Model
• Dissemination and Implementation Framework for an Early Childhood Obesity Prevention Program
• Dissemination of Evidence-based Interventions to Prevent Obesity
• EMTReK - Evidence-based Model for the Transfer and Exchange of Research Knowledge
• EQ-DI Framework
• Evidence Integration Triangle
• Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) model (Conceptual Model of Evidence-based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors)
• Facilitating Adoption of Best Practices (FAB) Model
• Framework for Dissemination of Evidence-Based Policy
• Framework for Enhancing the Value of Research for Dissemination and Implementation
• Framework for Spread
• Framework for Translating Evidence into Action
• Framework for the Dissemination & Utilization of Research for Health-Care Policy & Practice
• Framework for the Transfer of Patient Safety Research into Practice
• Framework of Dissemination in Health Services Intervention Research
• Generic Implementation Framework
• Greenhalgh Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations
• Health Promotion Technology Transfer Process
• Interacting Elements of Integrating Science, Policy, and Practice
• Intervention Mapping
• Kingdon's Multiple-Streams Framework
• Knowledge Exchange Framework
• Knowledge Transfer and Exchange
• Model for Improving the Dissemination of Nursing Research
• Pathways to Evidence Informed Policy
• Precede-Proceed Model
• Push-Pull Capacity Model
• Real-World Dissemination
• Replicating Effective Programs Framework
• Stetler Model of Research Utilization
• Technology Transfer Model
• Theoretical Domains Framework
• Transcreation Framework for Community-engaged Behavioral Interventions to Reduce Health Disparities
• Utilization-Focused Surveillance Framework
• Weiner organizational readiness

Implementation Outcomes:

The relevance of the assessment instrument to various implementation outcomes

• Acceptability

Implementation Strategies:

The implementation strategy/ies evaluated by the assessment instrument

Phase of Implementation Process:

Phase of implementation process when the assessment instrument can be used

• Pre-Implementation

Levels of Data Collection:

The level(s) from which the assessment instrument collects data

• Individual (Patient, Community Member)
• Implementer

Intended Priority Population:

Intended priority population from whom data are collected using the assessment instrument

• Community Members/Patients
• Administrator
• Teacher/Trainer
• Employer

Intended Priority Setting:

Intended priority setting in which the assessment instrument is used

• School

Policy:

Assessment instrument is relevant to policy

• Public (Laws, Regulations)

Equity Focus:

Scoring:

The assessment instrument produces a composite score

Norms:

Measures of central tendency and distribution for the total score are based on small, medium, large sample size

Responsiveness:

The ability of the assessment instrument to detect change over time (i.e., sensitivity to change or intervention effects).

Validity:

The extent to which an instrument measures what it is intended to measure accurately.

Reliability:

The extent to which results are consistent results over time, across raters, across settings, or across items intended to measure the same thing.

Factor Analysis:

A statistical method that uses the correlation between observed variables to identify common factors.

Time to Administer:

The amount of time required to complete the assessment instrument

Secondary Data:

Cost:

Cost associated with access to assessment instrument (Some insturments might require login.)

Literacy:

Readability of the items reported on.

Interpretation:

Expertise needed for interpretation of data is reported.

Training:

Expertise needed to use the assessment instrument is reported

Resources Required to Administer:

Resources needed to administer the assessment instrument (FTE for data collector, equipment, etc.)

User Guidance:

Guides are provided to support administration of assessment instrument/data collection, and/or analysis of data from the assessment instrument, and/or interpretation of data, and/or action/decision on how to use data

• Guidance to Administer

Obtrusiveness:

Degree of intrusion the participants will experience because of the data collection when using the assessment instrument (e.g., assessment instruments that rely on use of secondary data or automated data will be less obtrusive)

• Medium: Asyncronous collection of data

Interactivity:

Data collection and/or result generation involves interactive components.