Longitudinal Implementation Strategy Tracking System (LISTS)

Constructs Assessed:

Constructs assessed by the assessment instrument (linked to constructs included in the D&I models webtool)

• Adaptation and evolution
• Dose
• Outcomes – Implementation

Theories, Models, Frameworks Relevant:

• Adaptation in dissemination and implementation science
• Adherence Optimization Framework
• CDC DHAP's Research-to-Practice Framework
• Choosing Wisely Deimplementation Framework
• Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR)
• Conceptual Framework for Research Knowledge Transfer and Utilization
• Conceptual Model of Implementation Research
• Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
• Dissemination and Implementation Framework for an Early Childhood Obesity Prevention Program
• Dynamic Sustainability Framework
• EQ-DI Framework
• Facilitating Adoption of Best Practices (FAB) Model
• Framework for Enhancing the Value of Research for Dissemination and Implementation
• General theory of implementation
• Health Equity Implementation Framework
• Health Promotion Technology Transfer Process
• Implementation Effectiveness Model
• Interacting Elements of Integrating Science, Policy, and Practice
• Intervention Mapping
• Knowledge Exchange Framework
• Marketing and Distribution System for Public Heatlh
• Model for Predictors of Adoption
• Organizational Theory of Innovation Implementation
• Pathways to Evidence Informed Policy
• Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM)
• RE-AIM 2.0/Contextually Expanded RE-AIM
• Replicating Effective Programs Framework
• Stetler Model of Research Utilization
• Stirman framework and coding system for modifications and adaptations of evidence-based interventions
• Technology Transfer Model
• Transcreation Framework for Community-engaged Behavioral Interventions to Reduce Health Disparities
• Utilization-Focused Surveillance Framework

Implementation Outcomes:

The relevance of the assessment instrument to various implementation outcomes

• Adaptation
• Implementation

Implementation Strategies:

The implementation strategy/ies evaluated by the assessment instrument

• Adapt and tailor to context
• Use of evaluative and iterative strategies

Phase of Implementation Process:

Phase of implementation process when the assessment instrument can be used

• Implementation

Levels of Data Collection:

The level(s) from which the assessment instrument collects data

• Organizational
• System

Intended Priority Population:

Intended priority population from whom data are collected using the assessment instrument

• Researcher/Evaluator

Intended Priority Setting:

Intended priority setting in which the assessment instrument is used

• Clinical Outpatient
• Clinical Inpatient

Policy:

Assessment instrument is relevant to policy

Equity Focus:

Scoring:

The assessment instrument produces a composite score

Norms:

Measures of central tendency and distribution for the total score are based on small, medium, large sample size

Responsiveness:

The ability of the assessment instrument to detect change over time (i.e., sensitivity to change or intervention effects).

Validity:

The extent to which an instrument measures what it is intended to measure accurately.

Reliability:

The extent to which results are consistent results over time, across raters, across settings, or across items intended to measure the same thing.

Factor Analysis:

A statistical method that uses the correlation between observed variables to identify common factors.

Time to Administer:

The amount of time required to complete the assessment instrument

Secondary Data:

Cost:

Cost associated with access to assessment instrument (Some insturments might require login.)

Literacy:

Readability of the items reported on.

Interpretation:

Expertise needed for interpretation of data is reported.

Training:

Expertise needed to use the assessment instrument is reported

Resources Required to Administer:

Resources needed to administer the assessment instrument (FTE for data collector, equipment, etc.)

User Guidance:

Guides are provided to support administration of assessment instrument/data collection, and/or analysis of data from the assessment instrument, and/or interpretation of data, and/or action/decision on how to use data

Obtrusiveness:

Degree of intrusion the participants will experience because of the data collection when using the assessment instrument (e.g., assessment instruments that rely on use of secondary data or automated data will be less obtrusive)

• Low: Automated collection of data or secondary data
• Medium: Asyncronous collection of data

Interactivity:

Data collection and/or result generation involves interactive components.