Implementation Effectiveness Model
D and/or I:
The focus on dissemination and/or implementation activities. D-only focuses on an active approach of spreading evidence-based interventions to target audience via determined channels using planned strategies. D=I, D>I, and I>D means there is some focus on both dissemination and implementation. I-only focuses on process of putting to use or integrating evidence-based interventions within a setting.
I-Only 
The focus on dissemination and/or implementation activities. D-only focuses on an active approach of spreading evidence-based interventions to target audience via determined channels using planned strategies. D=I, D>I, and I>D means there is some focus on both dissemination and implementation. I-only focuses on process of putting to use or integrating evidence-based interventions within a setting.
Socio-Ecological Levels:
The level of the framework at which the model operates. Individual includes personal characteristics; Organization includes hospitals, service organizations, and factories; Community includes local government and neighborhoods; System includes hospital systems and government; Policy includes changes in policy.
The level of the framework at which the model operates. Individual includes personal characteristics; Organization includes hospitals, service organizations, and factories; Community includes local government and neighborhoods; System includes hospital systems and government; Policy includes changes in policy.
- Individual
- Organization
Number of Times Cited:
The # of times the original publication for the model was cited as indicated by Google Scholar since 2016.
159
The # of times the original publication for the model was cited as indicated by Google Scholar since 2016.
Figure:
Field of Origin:
The field of study in which the model originated.
Management
The field of study in which the model originated.
Rating:
These are ratings given by users of the site.
These are ratings given by users of the site.
Constructs:
Name of the construct developed by classifying/aligning the elements abstracted from models.
Name of the construct developed by classifying/aligning the elements abstracted from models.
Assessment Instruments:
- AHRQ Digital Health Equity Framework
- CFIR Interview Guide (Lam)
- CFIR Interview Guide (Zhao)
- CFIR Interview Guide Webtool
- Clinical Sustainability Assessment Tool (CSAT)
- Context Matters Reporting Template
- Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) Policy Survey
- Evidence Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS)
- FRAME-IS Adaptation Tracking Instrument
- Glisson's Organizational Social Context (OSC)
- Goodman's Level of Institutionalization
- Hall's Levels of Use Scale
- Implementation Climate Scale (ICS)
- Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS)
- Implementation Strategy Usability Scale
- Intervention Scalability Assessment Tool (ISAT)
- Iterative, Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (iPRISM) Webtool
- Landry's Knowledge Utilization Scale among Policymakers
- Local Wellness Policy Implementation Checklist
- Longitudinal Implementation Strategy Tracking System (LISTS)
- Normalization Process Theory Interview Guide
- Normalization Process Theory Questionnaire (NoMAD)
- Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC)
- PRISM Contextual Survey Instrument (PCSI)
- PRISM Interview Guide
- Partnership/Synergy Assessment Tool
- Policy Coalition Evaluation Tool (PCET)
- Program Sustainability Assessment Tool (PSAT)
- RAPICE Protocol, Activity, and Interview Prompt Guide
- RAPICE Summary Template
- Readiness Thinking Tool - Observation Guide
- Readiness Thinking Tool - Survey
- Readiness for Recovery and Resiliency - Interview Guide
- Rehabilitation Policy Questionnaire
- Short Program Sustainability Assessment Tool (PSAT)
- Stages of Implementation Completion (SIC)
- Van Schaik's Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)
- i-PARiHS Interview Guide
Citations:
The original publication(s) of the model.
Klein KJ, Conn AB, Sorra JS. Implementing computerized technology: an organizational analysis. J Appl Psychol 2001;86(5):811.
Klein KJ, Sorra JS. The challenge of innovation implementation. Acad Manag Rev 1996:1055–80.
The original publication(s) of the model.
Examples:
Citations of studies that have used the model as an outline for their study.
Dong L, Neufeld DJ, Higgins C. Testing Klein and Sorra’s innovation implementation model: an empirical examination. J Engin Technol Manag 2008;25(4):237-55.
Citations of studies that have used the model as an outline for their study.
Holahan PJ, Aronson ZH, Jurkat MP, Schoorman FD. Implementing computer technology: a multiorganizational test of Klein and Sorra’s model. J Engin Technol Manag 2004;21(1-2):31-50.
Osei-Bryson KM, Dong L, Ngwenyama O. Exploring managerial factors affecting ERP implementation: an investigation of the Klein-Sorra model using regression splines. Inf Syst J 2008;18(5):499-527.
Robertson J, Sorbello T, Unsworth K. Innovation Implementation: the role of technology diffusion agencies. J Technol Manag Innov 2008;3(3):1-10.
Sawang S. Innovation implementation effectiveness: a multiorganizational test of Klein Conn and Sorra’s model. [dissertation]. 2008.
Sheldon MR. Evidence-based practice in occupational health: description and application of an implementation effectiveness model. Work: J Prev Assess Rehab 2007;29(2):137-43.
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one.