Feasibility of Intervention measure (FIM)
Qualitative/Quantitative:
The assessment instrument uses quantitative and/or qualitative data
Quantitative
The assessment instrument uses quantitative and/or qualitative data
Type of Instrument:
The type of the assessment instrument
Survey
The type of the assessment instrument
Number of Items:
Number of items in the assessment instrument
<10
Number of items in the assessment instrument
Subscale Information:
Names of each of the subscales and the number of items for each of the subscales
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (4)
Names of each of the subscales and the number of items for each of the subscales
Language Availability:
Language(s) in which the assessment instrument is available
English
Language(s) in which the assessment instrument is available
Spanish
Brief Description:
Brief summary description of assessment instrument
Measuring the feasiblity or extent to which a new treatment, or an innovation, can be successfully used or carried out within a given agency or setting.
Brief summary description of assessment instrument
Citing Literature - Development/Original:
Reference for publication describing the development of the assessment instrument
Weiner BJ, Lewis CC, Stanick C, Powell BJ, Dorsey CN, Clary AS, Boynton MH, Halko H. Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 29;12(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3. PMID: 28851459; PMCID: PMC5576104.
Reference for publication describing the development of the assessment instrument
Citing Literature - Empirical Use/Application:
Reference for publications on the application of the assessment instrument
Weiner BJ, Lewis CC, Stanick C, Powell BJ, Dorsey CN, Clary AS, Boynton MH, Halko H. Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 29;12(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3. PMID: 28851459; PMCID: PMC5576104.
Reference for publications on the application of the assessment instrument
Website:
Website providing access to and/or describing the assessment instrument
Website providing access to and/or describing the assessment instrument
Attachments:
Related files uploaded (instrument if directly available) including descriptions for each
Not Found
Related files uploaded (instrument if directly available) including descriptions for each
Version:
Number/name of the most recent version of the assessment instrument
Not Found
Number/name of the most recent version of the assessment instrument
Related Instrument:
Indicate if assessment instrument is related to another instrument in the repository.
Acceptability of Intervention Measure
Indicate if assessment instrument is related to another instrument in the repository.
Intervention Appropriateness Measure
Implementation Science Considerations
- Choosing Wisely Deimplementation Framework
- Davis' Pathman-PRECEED Model
- Dissemination and Implementation Framework for an Early Childhood Obesity Prevention Program
- Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) model (Conceptual Model of Evidence-based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors)
- Intervention Mapping
- Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model and Guidelines
- Kingdon's Multiple-Streams Framework
- Knowledge Exchange Framework
- Model for Predictors of Adoption
- Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM)
- Proctor's Implementation Outcomes
- Transcreation Framework for Community-engaged Behavioral Interventions to Reduce Health Disparities
Constructs Assessed:
Constructs assessed by the assessment instrument (linked to constructs included in the D&I models webtool)
Theories, Models, Frameworks Assessed:
Not Found
The D&I TMFs relevant for the assesment instrument based on constructs assessed
Implementation Outcomes:
Feasibility
The relevance of the assessment instrument to various implementation outcomes
Implementation Strategies:
Not Found
The implementation strategy/ies evaluated by the assessment instrument
Phase of Implementation Process:
Pre-Implementation
Phase of implementation process when the assessment instrument can be used
Models Assessed:
Intended Focus
Levels of Data Collection:
Implementer
The level(s) from which the assessment instrument collects data
Organizational
Community
System
PolicyIntended Priority Population:
Community Members/Patients
Intended priority population from whom data are collected using the assessment instrument
Researcher/Evaluator
Clinician
Administrator
Public Health Practitioner
Teacher/Trainer
EmployerIntended Priority Setting:
Clinical Outpatient
Intended priority setting in which the assessment instrument is used
Clinical Inpatient
Residential Care
Community Organization
Public Health Agency
School
WorkplacePolicy:
Not Found
Assessment instrument is relevant to policy
Equity Focus:
Yes
Assessment instrument includes at least one equity-focused component
Psychometric Properties
Scoring:
Yes
The assessment instrument produces a composite score
Norms:
Not Found
Measures of central tendency and distribution for the total score are based on small, medium, large sample size
Responsiveness:
Not Found
The ability of the assessment instrument to detect change over time (i.e., sensitivity to change or intervention effects).
Validity:
Known Group Validity (Definition)Reliability:
Test-Retest Reliability (Definition)Factor Analysis:
Not Found
Pragmatic Properties
Time to Administer:
Not Found
The amount of time required to complete the assessment instrument
Secondary Data:
Not FoundCost:
Free
Cost associated with access to assessment instrument (Some insturments might require login.)
Literacy:
Yes
Readability of the items reported on.
Interpretation:
Not Found
Expertise needed for interpretation of data is reported.
Training:
Not Found
Expertise needed to use the assessment instrument is reported
Resources Required to Administer:
None/Low
Resources needed to administer the assessment instrument (FTE for data collector, equipment, etc.)
User Guidance:
Not Found
Guides are provided to support administration of assessment instrument/data collection, and/or analysis of data from the assessment instrument, and/or interpretation of data, and/or action/decision on how to use data
Obtrusiveness:
Low: Automated collection of data or secondary data
Degree of intrusion the participants will experience because of the data collection when using the assessment instrument (e.g., assessment instruments that rely on use of secondary data or automated data will be less obtrusive)
Interactivity:
Not Found
Data collection and/or result generation involves interactive components.
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one.