Intervention Scalability Assessment Tool (ISAT)
Qualitative/Quantitative:
The assessment instrument uses quantitative and/or qualitative data
Qualitative
The assessment instrument uses quantitative and/or qualitative data
Type of Instrument:
The type of the assessment instrument
Survey
The type of the assessment instrument
Number of Items:
Number of items in the assessment instrument
19
Number of items in the assessment instrument
Subscale Information:
Names of each of the subscales and the number of items for each of the subscales
THE PROBLEM (1)
THE PROGRAM/INTERVENTION (1)
STRATEGIC/POLITICAL CONTEXT (2)
EVIDENCE OF EFFECTIVENESS (1)
INTERVENTION COSTS (1)
FIDELITY AND ADAPTATION (3)
DELIVERY SETTING AND WORKFORCE (4)
IMPLEMENTATION INFRASTRUCTURE (1)
SUSTAINABILITY (3)
Names of each of the subscales and the number of items for each of the subscales
Language Availability:
Language(s) in which the assessment instrument is available
English
Language(s) in which the assessment instrument is available
French
Brief Description:
Brief summary description of assessment instrument
The Intervention Scalability Assessment Tool (ISAT) was developed to support policy-makers and practitioners to make systematic assessments of the suitability of health interventions for scale-up.
Brief summary description of assessment instrument
Citing Literature - Development/Original:
Reference for publication describing the development of the assessment instrument
Milat A, Lee K, Conte K, Grunseit A, Wolfenden L, van Nassau F, Orr N, Sreeram P, Bauman A. Intervention Scalability Assessment Tool: A decision support tool for health policy makers and implementers. Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Jan 3;18(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0494-2. PMID: 31900230; PMCID: PMC6942323.
Reference for publication describing the development of the assessment instrument
Citing Literature - Empirical Use/Application:
Reference for publications on the application of the assessment instrument
Lee K, Milat A, Grunseit A, Conte K, Wolfenden L, Bauman A. The Intervention Scalability Assessment Tool: a pilot study assessing five interventions for scalability. Public Health Res Pract. 2020;30(2):e3022011.
Grady A, Jackson J, Wolfenden L, Lum M, Yoong SL. Assessing the scalability of healthy eating interventions within the early childhood education and care setting: secondary analysis of a Cochrane systematic review. Public Health Nutrition. 2023;26(12):3211-3229. doi:10.1017/S1368980023002550
Reference for publications on the application of the assessment instrument
Website:
Website providing access to and/or describing the assessment instrument
Website providing access to and/or describing the assessment instrument
Attachments:
Related files uploaded (instrument if directly available) including descriptions for each
Related files uploaded (instrument if directly available) including descriptions for each
Version:
Number/name of the most recent version of the assessment instrument
10/19/24
Number/name of the most recent version of the assessment instrument
Related Instrument:
Indicate if assessment instrument is related to another instrument in the repository.
Visual output similar to precis 2-PS
Indicate if assessment instrument is related to another instrument in the repository.
Some domains related to PRISM
Implementation Science Considerations
- ACE Star Model of Knowledge Transformation
- Active Implementation Framework
- Adaptation in dissemination and implementation science
- Adherence Optimization Framework
- Advancing health disparities research within the health care system
- Availability, Responsiveness & Continuity (ARC): An Organizational & Community Intervention Model
- Behaviour Change Wheel
- Blueprint for Dissemination
- CDC DHAP's Research-to-Practice Framework
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research Knowledge Translation within the Research Cycle Model or Knowledge Action Model
- Choosing Wisely Deimplementation Framework
- Collaborative Model for Knowledge Translation Between Research and Practice Settings
- Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR)
- Conceptual Framework For The Comparative Analysis of Policy Change
- Conceptual Framework for Research Knowledge Transfer and Utilization
- Conceptual Model of Implementation Research
- Conceptual Model of Knowledge Utilization
- Conceptualizing Dissemination Research and Activity: Canadian Heart Health Initiative
- Conduct and Utilization of Research in Nursing (CURN)
- Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
- Convergent Diffusion and Social Marketing Approach for Dissemination
- Coordinated Implementation Model
- Critical Realism & the Arts Research Utilization Model (CRARIUM)
- Davis' Pathman-PRECEED Model
- Dissemination and Implementation Framework for an Early Childhood Obesity Prevention Program
- Dissemination of Evidence-based Interventions to Prevent Obesity
- Dynamic Sustainability Framework
- EMTReK - Evidence-based Model for the Transfer and Exchange of Research Knowledge
- EQ-DI Framework
- Effective Dissemination Strategies
- Evidence Integration Triangle
- Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) model (Conceptual Model of Evidence-based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors)
- Facilitating Adoption of Best Practices (FAB) Model
- Framework for Analyzing Adoption of Complex Health Innovations
- Framework for Dissemination of Evidence-Based Policy
- Framework for Enhancing the Value of Research for Dissemination and Implementation
- Framework for Knowledge Translation
- Framework for Spread
- Framework for the Dissemination & Utilization of Research for Health-Care Policy & Practice
- Framework for the Transfer of Patient Safety Research into Practice
- Framework of Dissemination in Health Services Intervention Research
- General theory of implementation
- Generic Implementation Framework
- Greenhalgh Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations
- Health Equity Implementation Framework
- Health Promotion Research Center Framework
- Health Promotion Technology Transfer Process
- Implementation Effectiveness Model
- Interacting Elements of Integrating Science, Policy, and Practice
- Interactive Systems Framework
- Intervention Mapping
- Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice
- Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model and Guidelines
- Kingdon's Multiple-Streams Framework
- Knowledge Exchange Framework
- Knowledge Transfer and Exchange
- Linking Systems Framework
- Marketing and Distribution System for Public Heatlh
- Model for Improving the Dissemination of Nursing Research
- Model for Predictors of Adoption
- Organizational Theory of Innovation Implementation
- OutPatient Treatment in Ontario Services (OPTIONS) Model
- Pathways to Evidence Informed Policy
- Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM)
- Pragmatic-Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary 2
- Precede-Proceed Model
- Proctor's Implementation Outcomes
- Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS)
- Pronovost's 4E's Process Theory
- Push-Pull Capacity Model
- RAND Model of Persuasive Communication and Diffusion of Medical Innovation
- RE-AIM 1.0 Framework
- RE-AIM 2.0/Contextually Expanded RE-AIM
- Real-World Dissemination
- Replicating Effective Programs Framework
- Six-Step Framework for International Physical Activity Dissemination
- Stetler Model of Research Utilization
- Sticky Knowledge
- Stirman framework and coding system for modifications and adaptations of evidence-based interventions
- Technology Transfer Model
- Theoretical Domains Framework
- Transcreation Framework for Community-engaged Behavioral Interventions to Reduce Health Disparities
- Weiner organizational readiness
- conNECT Framework
Constructs Assessed:
Constructs assessed by the assessment instrument (linked to constructs included in the D&I models webtool)
Theories, Models, Frameworks Assessed:
Not Found
The D&I TMFs relevant for the assesment instrument based on constructs assessed
Implementation Outcomes:
Acceptability
The relevance of the assessment instrument to various implementation outcomes
Adoption
Effectiveness
Fidelity
Implementation
Implementation Cost
Reach
SustainmentImplementation Strategies:
Use of evaluative and iterative strategies
The implementation strategy/ies evaluated by the assessment instrument
Provide interactive assistance
Adapt and tailor to context
Develop stakeholder inter-relationshipsPhase of Implementation Process:
Pre-Implementation
Phase of implementation process when the assessment instrument can be used
ImplementationModels Assessed:
Intended Focus
Levels of Data Collection:
Implementer
The level(s) from which the assessment instrument collects data
Organizational
Community
System
PolicyIntended Priority Population:
Researcher/Evaluator
Intended priority population from whom data are collected using the assessment instrument
Clinician
Administrator
Employer
System/Policy MakerIntended Priority Setting:
Clinical Outpatient
Intended priority setting in which the assessment instrument is used
Clinical Inpatient
Residential Care
Community Organization
Public Health Agency
School
WorkplacePolicy:
Not Found
Assessment instrument is relevant to policy
Equity Focus:
Not Found
Assessment instrument includes at least one equity-focused component
Psychometric Properties
Scoring:
Yes
The assessment instrument produces a composite score
Norms:
Not Found
Measures of central tendency and distribution for the total score are based on small, medium, large sample size
Responsiveness:
Yes
The ability of the assessment instrument to detect change over time (i.e., sensitivity to change or intervention effects).
Validity:
Not FoundReliability:
Not FoundFactor Analysis:
Not Found
Pragmatic Properties
Time to Administer:
Not Found
The amount of time required to complete the assessment instrument
Secondary Data:
Not FoundCost:
Free
Cost associated with access to assessment instrument (Some insturments might require login.)
Literacy:
Not Found
Readability of the items reported on.
Interpretation:
Not Found
Expertise needed for interpretation of data is reported.
Training:
Not Found
Expertise needed to use the assessment instrument is reported
Resources Required to Administer:
None/Low
Resources needed to administer the assessment instrument (FTE for data collector, equipment, etc.)
User Guidance:
Guidance to Administer
Guides are provided to support administration of assessment instrument/data collection, and/or analysis of data from the assessment instrument, and/or interpretation of data, and/or action/decision on how to use data
Guidance to Analyze
Guidance to Interpret
Guidance for Action/DecisionObtrusiveness:
Medium: Asyncronous collection of data
Degree of intrusion the participants will experience because of the data collection when using the assessment instrument (e.g., assessment instruments that rely on use of secondary data or automated data will be less obtrusive)
High: Observation and syncronous collection of dataInteractivity:
Adaptive Instrument
Data collection and/or result generation involves interactive components.
Generative Outcome
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one.